0.00/0.09	% Problem    : Vampire---4.8_20119 : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.00/0.10	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.09/0.30	% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
0.09/0.30	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.09/0.30	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.09/0.30	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.09/0.30	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.09/0.30	% CPULimit   : 1440
0.09/0.30	% WCLimit    : 180
0.09/0.30	% DateTime   : Mon Jul  3 13:08:22 EDT 2023
0.09/0.30	% CPUTime    : 
0.15/0.40	Running higher-order theorem provingRunning: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.h29iYcbZ5F/Vampire---4.8_20119
0.15/0.40	# Version: 3.1pre001-ho
0.15/0.40	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSCSSA.
0.15/0.40	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.15/0.40	# Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 900s (5) cores
0.15/0.40	# Starting new_bool_9 with 180s (1) cores
0.15/0.40	# Starting full_lambda_8 with 180s (1) cores
0.15/0.40	# Starting post_as_ho10 with 180s (1) cores
0.15/0.40	# full_lambda_8 with pid 20300 completed with status 0
0.15/0.40	# Result found by full_lambda_8
0.15/0.40	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSCSSA.
0.15/0.40	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.15/0.40	# Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 900s (5) cores
0.15/0.40	# Starting new_bool_9 with 180s (1) cores
0.15/0.40	# Starting full_lambda_8 with 180s (1) cores
0.15/0.40	# No SInE strategy applied
0.15/0.40	# Search class: HHUPF-FFSF11-SSSFFMBN
0.15/0.40	# Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.15/0.40	# Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 109s (1) cores
0.15/0.40	# ho_unfolding_3 with pid 20303 completed with status 0
0.15/0.40	# Result found by ho_unfolding_3
0.15/0.40	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSCSSA.
0.15/0.40	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.15/0.40	# Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 900s (5) cores
0.15/0.40	# Starting new_bool_9 with 180s (1) cores
0.15/0.40	# Starting full_lambda_8 with 180s (1) cores
0.15/0.40	# No SInE strategy applied
0.15/0.40	# Search class: HHUPF-FFSF11-SSSFFMBN
0.15/0.40	# Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.15/0.40	# Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 109s (1) cores
0.15/0.40	# Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.15/0.40	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.15/0.40	
0.15/0.40	# Proof found!
0.15/0.40	# SZS status Theorem
0.15/0.40	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.15/0.40	thf(decl_22, type, h: ($i > $o) > $i).
0.15/0.40	thf(decl_23, type, epred1_1: ($i > $i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.15/0.40	thf(decl_25, type, esk2_2: $i > $i > $o).
0.15/0.40	thf(cTHM573_pme, conjecture, (?[X1:$i > $i > $o]:(![X2:$i > $o]:(?[X3:$i]:(((X1 @ X3)=(X2)))))<=![X4:$i > $o, X5:$i > $o]:((((X4)=(X5))<=((h @ X4)=(h @ X5))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.h29iYcbZ5F/Vampire---4.8_20119', cTHM573_pme)).
0.15/0.40	thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~((![X4:$i > $o, X5:$i > $o]:((((h @ X4)=(h @ X5))=>((X4)=(X5))))=>?[X1:$i > $i > $o]:(![X2:$i > $o]:(?[X3:$i]:(((X1 @ X3)=(X2))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM573_pme])])).
0.15/0.40	thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ![X11:$i > $o, X12:$i > $o, X13:$i > $i > $o, X15:$i]:(((((h @ X11)!=(h @ X12))|((X11)=(X12)))&((X13 @ X15)!=(epred1_1 @ X13)))), inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])).
0.15/0.40	thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i > $o, X4:$i > $o]:((((X2)=(X4))|((h @ X2)!=(h @ X4)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.15/0.40	thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ![X3:$i, X1:$i > $i > $o]:(((X1 @ X3)!=(epred1_1 @ X1))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.15/0.40	thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i > $o]:(((esk2_2 @ (h @ X2))=(X2))), inference(recognize_injectivity,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])).
0.15/0.40	thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4, c_0_5])]), ['proof']).
0.15/0.40	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.15/0.40	# Parsed axioms                        : 2
0.15/0.40	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
0.15/0.40	# Initial clauses                      : 3
0.15/0.40	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 1
0.15/0.40	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 2
0.15/0.40	# Processed clauses                    : 5
0.15/0.40	# ...of these trivial                  : 0
0.15/0.40	# ...subsumed                          : 0
0.15/0.40	# ...remaining for further processing  : 5
0.15/0.40	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 1
0.15/0.40	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.15/0.40	# Backward-subsumed                    : 0
0.15/0.40	# Backward-rewritten                   : 0
0.15/0.40	# Generated clauses                    : 7
0.15/0.40	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 4
0.15/0.40	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.15/0.40	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.15/0.40	# Paramodulations                      : 1
0.15/0.40	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.15/0.40	# NegExts                              : 1
0.15/0.40	# Equation resolutions                 : 2
0.15/0.40	# Total rewrite steps                  : 0
0.15/0.40	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.15/0.40	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.15/0.40	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.15/0.40	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.15/0.40	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.15/0.40	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.15/0.40	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.15/0.40	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.15/0.40	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.15/0.40	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.15/0.40	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.15/0.40	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.15/0.40	# Current number of processed clauses  : 3
0.15/0.40	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 1
0.15/0.40	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.15/0.40	#    Negative unit clauses             : 1
0.15/0.40	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1
0.15/0.40	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2
0.15/0.40	# ...number of literals in the above   : 3
0.15/0.40	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.15/0.40	# Current number of archived clauses   : 2
0.15/0.40	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
0.15/0.40	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
0.15/0.40	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
0.15/0.40	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
0.15/0.40	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.15/0.40	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
0.15/0.40	# BW rewrite match successes           : 0
0.15/0.40	# Condensation attempts                : 5
0.15/0.40	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.15/0.40	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 204
0.15/0.40	
0.15/0.40	# -------------------------------------------------
0.15/0.40	# User time                : 0.002 s
0.15/0.40	# System time              : 0.001 s
0.15/0.40	# Total time               : 0.003 s
0.15/0.40	# Maximum resident set size: 1596 pages
0.15/0.40	
0.15/0.40	# -------------------------------------------------
0.15/0.40	# User time                : 0.004 s
0.15/0.40	# System time              : 0.002 s
0.15/0.40	# Total time               : 0.005 s
0.15/0.40	# Maximum resident set size: 1724 pages
0.15/0.40	% E---3.1 exiting
0.15/0.40	EOF